So what can we learn from dogs from the way that they play?
It’s a fair question yet one where it might be perfectly reasonable to wonder if we humans have anything to learn from the playing of dogs. The answers may surprise.
But first, let’s examine what is known about the playing of dogs.
Marc Bekoff, Professor Emeritus of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Colorado, Boulder, is referred to extensively in The Washington Post; May 19th, 2014, in an article written by David Grimm, author of a new book: Citizen Canine.
David Grimm writes about the research undertaken by Marc Bekoff, who studies dog play and that, “studying dog play reveals more than the animals’ emotional lives. It could ultimately shed light on the evolution of human emotions and how we came to build a civilisation based on laws and co-operation, empathy and altruism.”
Now that is a fascinating idea; that understanding why dogs play might help our understanding of how our emotions evolved. Up until this point, it had never occurred to me that our emotions evolved in just the same way that the rest of who we are today evolved. Sort of common-sense, I guess!
David Grimm goes on to write in that Washington Post article: “All of this suggests that dogs have a kind of moral code — one long hidden to humans until a cognitive ethologist named Marc Bekoff began to crack it.”
As I read the article it started to dawn on me that possibly the reason that we humans devote so much time, energy, and frequently money, in playing, may have much deeper roots, as with our dogs.
Few people had studied animal play, but Bekoff was intrigued. “Play is a major expenditure of energy, and it can be dangerous,” he says. “You can twist a shoulder or break a leg, and it can increase your chances of being preyed upon. So why do they do it? It has to feel good.”
Suddenly, Bekoff wasn’t interested just in behaviour; he was interested also in emotions and, fundamentally, what was going on inside these animals’ heads.
As the article reveals, Professor Bekoff, “wasn’t the first scientist to become intrigued by the canine mind”, reminding us that Charles Darwin was sure that dogs could engage in abstract thought, owned a sense of morality and used language. In Darwin’s lifetime he had thirteen dogs so had plenty of opportunity to become aware of what most of today’s dog owners know: that we humans and dogs can communicate with each other.
But back to emotions.
Back to David Grimm’s article:
Even morality hints at something deeper, however. To enforce moral conduct, dogs must be able to experience a spectrum of emotions, from joy to indignation, guilt to jealousy. They must also be able to read these emotions in others, distinguishing accident from intent, honesty from deceit. And indeed, recent studies by other scientists have shown evidence of these abilities (confirming what many dog owners already feel about their pets).
Scientists have found, for example, that dogs trained to shake hands with humans will stop shaking if they notice that they aren’t being rewarded for the trick although a nearby dog is — a sign, the researchers suggested, that dogs can sense inequity.
Thus from the playing of dogs (and wolves) comes great insight into the emotions and social conduct of humans. I will return to that idea at the end of the chapter.
Like millions of other dog lovers, I know from strong personal experience that dogs have a great sensitivity to how I am behaving and feeling. Even almost taking it for granted that when I yawn, the chances are that one of our dogs will yawn. Or believing, without any doubt, that dogs show empathy for us humans; I can easily recall my Pharaoh licking tears from my face. What I didn’t realise until reading the Washington Post article is that empathy is a rarely documented trait in the animal kingdom.
We know what our dogs are feeling from their behaviour and their vocal sounds. Know instinctively that when a dog nudges me awake in the early hours of the morning, it is because it needs to go outside for a ‘call of nature’ and can’t wait until the normal waking hour.
Our dogs know what we are feeling from our behaviours, our body ‘language’ and our vocal sounds.
We all, all of us dog owners that is, know this and take it for granted. Perhaps not quite in the clarity of Professor Bekoff’s recent work that “suggests another remarkable canine skill: the ability to know what another animal is thinking — a so-called “theory of mind.””
Back to play. Science is suggesting that play, as initially researched with dogs, is very important, incredibly so, to our species. That without play, us humans would have had an impossible task of learning or interacting with the world around us. That our insight into our human emotions and the way we conduct ourselves, in a social context, flows down from learning from dogs.
Leaving one inescapable conclusion, one that so perfectly links to community: never stop playing. Never stop playing with others; humans and dogs alike.
872 words Copyright © 2014 Paul Handover
Another great post. I have noticed when my mum was ill the dogs behavior changed dramatically,gone were the bounding gleeful dogs, they became more solemn and quiet spending time sitting my her side.
As to Darwin’s theory or remarks I can only add that if Ellie is searching and is indecisive she will arrive back at my side to check with me, an inquisitive tilt of the head is almost a question asking me if she is to carry on and when instructed to she invariably does so until we have found our target.
I have also noticed the manner in which all animals reprimand youngsters who step out of line, it is done quickly and efficiently, just a tap to remind them of the rules of fair play. I often wonder if we humans aren’t the stupid ones as we simply nod and smile at bad behavior and then years later wonder why our child has turned into someone with no regard of others.
LikeLike
Maria, what a fabulous reply from you. Thank you and so glad you enjoyed the chapter! Who knows, one of these days may get around to editing and finishing it!
LikeLike
Paul great thoughts here my friend. and sometimes Science is too scientific LOL.. And do not want to accept that our Pets have a sixth sense and can communicate and think and link with our thoughts… Animals are far more intelligent than science gives them credit for.. 🙂
LikeLike
Sue, when you write “And do not want to accept” did you mean to write that you DO accept …? If so, I’ll amend your comment. Either way, thanks so much for your feedback.
LikeLike
What I meant is that often science dismiss the the sixth sense .. I meant science Does Not always accept.. At least thats what I meant.. 🙂 Clear as Mud
LikeLike
🙂 Well at least it’s clear to the readers!
LikeLike