A new angle on the famous ‘hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil’ saying!
What climate change??
That new angle being ‘hear no climate change, see no climate change, speak no climate change!‘
So what has prompted this outburst from me? It started with me seeing a truly scary graph that was on Peter Sinclair’s Climate Crock blogsite on the 20th September. That was the graph that was published yesterday on Learning from Dogs under the post title of It’s not rocket science! If you didn’t see that graph yesterday, don’t read further on until you have looked at it.
Thus while today’s post could easily be interpreted as yet another blogpost from yet another writer about climate change, that is not the case. What I am doing is taking a quick trip across a few recently published items that really do make it utterly clear what is happening to the Earth’s biosphere, all in support of a very simple question to two gentlemen who are currently in the news; stay with me for all to become clear!
However, this is what caught my eye, (an interview between Dr. Francis and Peter Sinclair).
What she told me in a recent interview was that the sea ice record is not something that we just pay attention to in September – there will, in fact, be reverberations that will make fall and winter “very interesting” around the globe.
An unusually strong storm formed off the coast of Alaska on August 5 and tracked into the center of the Arctic Ocean, where it slowly dissipated over the next several days. The center of the storm was located in the middle of the Arctic Ocean.
On Wednesday, the National Snow and Ice Data Center concluded Arctic sea ice is at its lowest late-August level since records began, and the area covered by ice has continued to shrink in September. Since 1979, the 1.54 million square miles of ice is the smallest coverage on record at the North Pole, the report states.
With so many questions surrounding these latest findings, perhaps one of the most immediate is whether this melting of sea ice will affect the upcoming winter across the United States and Northern Hemisphere. Is it possible that a lack of Arctic sea ice could change weather patterns across the globe?
Four meteorologists spoke about these possibilities, and while they didn’t say dramatic weather shifts are imminent in the short-term, they did give some thoughts on what could happen.
One of the meteorologists was Dr. Jeff Masters, Director of Meteorology, Weather Underground. He wrote,
In my December 2011 blog post, I discuss research by Dr. Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University, who found that Arctic sea ice loss may significantly affect the upper-level atmospheric circulation, slowing its winds and increasing its tendency to make contorted high-amplitude loops. High-amplitude loops in the upper level wind pattern (and associated jet stream) increases the probability of persistent weather patterns in the Northern Hemisphere, potentially leading to extreme weather due to longer-duration cold spells, snow events, heat waves, flooding events, and drought conditions.
Several studies published in 2012 have linked Arctic sea ice loss to an increase in probability of severe winter weather in Western Europe, Eastern North America and Eastern Asia.
Then if one goes to that December 2011 blog post, one reads this,
“The question is not whether sea ice loss is affecting the large-scale atmospheric circulation…it’s how can it not?” That was the take-home message from Dr. Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University, in her talk “Does Arctic Amplification Fuel Extreme Weather in Mid-Latitudes?“, presented at last week’s American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco. Dr. Francis presented new research in review for publication, which shows that Arctic sea ice loss may significantly affect the upper-level atmospheric circulation, slowing its winds and increasing its tendency to make contorted high-amplitude loops. High-amplitude loops in the upper level wind pattern (and associated jet stream) increases the probability of persistent weather patterns in the Northern Hemisphere, potentially leading to extreme weather due to longer-duration cold spells, snow events, heat waves, flooding events, and drought conditions.
Arctic sea ice loss can slow down jet stream winds
Dr. Francis looked at surface and upper level data from 1948 – 2010, and discovered that the extra heat in the Arctic in fall and winter over the past decade had caused the Arctic atmosphere between the surface and 500 mb (about 18,000 feet or 5,600 meters) to expand. As a result, the difference in temperature between the Arctic (60 – 80°N) and the mid-latitudes (30 – 50°N) fell significantly. It is this difference in temperature that drives the powerful jet stream winds that control much of our weather. The speed of fall and winter west-to-east upper-level winds at 500 mb circling the North Pole decreased by 20% over the past decade, compared to the period 1948 – 2000, in response to the extra warmth in the Arctic. This slow-down of the upper-level winds circling the pole has been linked to a Hot Arctic-Cold Continents pattern that brought cold, snowy winters to the Eastern U.S. and Western Europe during 2009 – 2010 and 2010 – 2011.
OK, nearly finished! Stay with me for one last item. Did you note in that blog post (the first section quoted) this, “Dr. Francis presented new research in review for publication …“? Here’s the Abstract from that publication, from which one reads,
Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes
Key Points
Enhanced Arctic warming reduces poleward temperature gradient
Weaker gradient affects waves in upper-level flow in two observable ways
Both effects slow weather patterns, favoring extreme weather
Jennifer A. Francis, Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Stephen J. Vavrus, Center for Climatic Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
So to the point of both yesterday’s Post and the information above.
Will someone tell me why Messrs Barack Obama and Willard Mitt Romney so fervently adopt the stance of ‘hear no climate change, see no climate change, speak no climate change!‘
5 thoughts on “Hear no evil; or is that hear no climate change?”
With every extreme weather event we experience, two things will now happen: Those who accept the nature of reality and the Laws of Physics will acknowledge that human activity has upset the dynamic equilibrium of our atmosphere; and those who dispute the nature of reality and the Laws of Physics will not.
However, I think the real paradox is that the development of agriculture, urbanisation and civilisation in the last 12,000 years would have been impossible without this dynamic equilibrium; and yet Homo sapiens (wonderful irony) have been so successful at colonising the planet that the rate at which they are now polluting the atmosphere has destabilised that equilibrium.
You seem to think that we are near the “tipping point” for the reality-challenged (i.e. when people will not be able to dispute the cause and effect relationship). Sadly, I am not so optimistic – in case you had not noticed 😉 – I think people will carry on denying the nature of reality (because they do not want to lose out on all the emotional and intellectual energy they have invested in doing so for so long)…Therefore, even after the sea ice is all gone I suspect they will still be blaming its disappearance (or at least 30% of its disappearance) on the Sun.
However, to get back to reality, I must now admit that the central point of all that you have reported here is is exactly what Patrice has repeatedly said: Any reduction in temperature difference must be accompanied by reduction in wind speed. Perhaps, then, Patrice can also explain how a cyclonic wind system can develop at or near the Pole (where there is no angular momentum to produce it)?
I think the simple answer to my own question is as follows:
Angular momentum is greatest at the Equator and zero along the axis of rotation (i.e. at the geographic pole). However, because the Earth is an oblate spheroid, angular momentum increases rapidly as soon as you move away from the Pole. Therefore since the diameter of cyclonic systems is typically measured in hundreds of miles, they can easily develop at very high latitudes (but are very unlikely to hover over the Pole itself).
One should not call on the devil to rise, lest one is well prepared… First, there is still ice at the pole, last I checked… I better check often, agreed. So there are still an important cold sinks at the poles. Hurricanes come from temperature differences. The gas giants experience enormous one in their upper (cold) atmospheres.
Cold cyclones in the polar regions are a relatively recent discovery, but they were there all along. They can be devastating, although more compact than tropical cyclones.
It turns out, as I already said, that paleo climate studies have unveiled, hundreds of millions years ago, situations where not only there was no more ice, but still irrigation in the middle of extremely hot continents. The only explanation is that super giant hurricanes were doing all the irrigation. They were energized by the extremely high temperature gradients inside the land.
BTW, there is supposed to be 400 TW of wind energy on the ground, and 1,800 TW in the jet streams. So the future of wind energy is in the high atmosphere. Plus: as warming will force the jets north, it will good to have mobile installations.
PA
With every extreme weather event we experience, two things will now happen: Those who accept the nature of reality and the Laws of Physics will acknowledge that human activity has upset the dynamic equilibrium of our atmosphere; and those who dispute the nature of reality and the Laws of Physics will not.
However, I think the real paradox is that the development of agriculture, urbanisation and civilisation in the last 12,000 years would have been impossible without this dynamic equilibrium; and yet Homo sapiens (wonderful irony) have been so successful at colonising the planet that the rate at which they are now polluting the atmosphere has destabilised that equilibrium.
You seem to think that we are near the “tipping point” for the reality-challenged (i.e. when people will not be able to dispute the cause and effect relationship). Sadly, I am not so optimistic – in case you had not noticed 😉 – I think people will carry on denying the nature of reality (because they do not want to lose out on all the emotional and intellectual energy they have invested in doing so for so long)…Therefore, even after the sea ice is all gone I suspect they will still be blaming its disappearance (or at least 30% of its disappearance) on the Sun.
However, to get back to reality, I must now admit that the central point of all that you have reported here is is exactly what Patrice has repeatedly said: Any reduction in temperature difference must be accompanied by reduction in wind speed. Perhaps, then, Patrice can also explain how a cyclonic wind system can develop at or near the Pole (where there is no angular momentum to produce it)?
LikeLike
Thanks Martin. I’ll leave it to Patrice to address the question you raise at the end of your comment.
LikeLike
I think the simple answer to my own question is as follows:
Angular momentum is greatest at the Equator and zero along the axis of rotation (i.e. at the geographic pole). However, because the Earth is an oblate spheroid, angular momentum increases rapidly as soon as you move away from the Pole. Therefore since the diameter of cyclonic systems is typically measured in hundreds of miles, they can easily develop at very high latitudes (but are very unlikely to hover over the Pole itself).
LikeLike
One should not call on the devil to rise, lest one is well prepared… First, there is still ice at the pole, last I checked… I better check often, agreed. So there are still an important cold sinks at the poles. Hurricanes come from temperature differences. The gas giants experience enormous one in their upper (cold) atmospheres.
Cold cyclones in the polar regions are a relatively recent discovery, but they were there all along. They can be devastating, although more compact than tropical cyclones.
It turns out, as I already said, that paleo climate studies have unveiled, hundreds of millions years ago, situations where not only there was no more ice, but still irrigation in the middle of extremely hot continents. The only explanation is that super giant hurricanes were doing all the irrigation. They were energized by the extremely high temperature gradients inside the land.
BTW, there is supposed to be 400 TW of wind energy on the ground, and 1,800 TW in the jet streams. So the future of wind energy is in the high atmosphere. Plus: as warming will force the jets north, it will good to have mobile installations.
PA
LikeLike
Martin, Patrice, thanks for your comments to this post and my apologies for the delay in so saying. Paul
LikeLike