Not so common sense!

Sometimes one wonders what happened to common sense!

Today’s Post is motivated by a number of items that have crossed my screen over the last few days which when looked at collectively might remind one of the old saw, “You don’t have to be mad to work here, but it does help!

Sit with me, metaphorically, and allow me to muse.

First was a recent Post on 350 or bust that included the March 2012 TED Conference in Long Beach, California where NASA climate scientist Dr. James Hansen explains why he must speak out about climate change. (See the video later on.)  That Post refers to an item on Martin Lack’s Blog, Lack of Environment, where Martin as well as including the video below also lists the challenges that we on this single, finite planet face.  Here is that list,

  1. The Earth’s current energy imbalance is 0.6 Watts per sq.m.; a rate of energy input 20 times greater than the energy output of all human activity; and equivalent to the detonation of 400,000 Hiroshima-type atomic bombs every day.
  2. Since measurements began in 2003, there has been a noticeable acceleration in the annual rate of mass loss from both the Greenland and Antarctica ice caps.
  3. The last time atmospheric CO2 was 390 ppm, sea levels were 15 m higher than they are today, which implies even if we stopped burning all fossil fuels tomorrow, this is where they would end up several centuries from now because the warming “is already in the pipeline” (i.e. because the Earth must warm-up in order to restore its energy balance).
  4. Unless we stop burning fossil fuels soon, sea level rise will continue to accelerate, which is likely to cause between 1 and 5 metre rise by 2100AD (depending on how quickly we now decide to stop burning them).
  5. Palaeoclimatology tells us that 350 ppm is the safe limit for avoiding significant disruption to the planet’s ecological carrying capacity (i.e. in terms of both populations of individual species and overall biodivesity); and it now seems likely that between 20%-50% of all species will be “ticketed for extinction” by the end of the century.
  6. If we push the Earth beyond it’s “tipping point” (i.e. allow all the emerging positive feedback mechanisms to take hold); ACD will become unstoppable; and the ensuing socio-economic damage will be almost unimaginable. The total global cost of mitigation is already put at somewhere between 35 and 70 Trillion US Dollars depending on how soon we choose to act.
  7. If we had started to get off fossil fuels in 2005, it would have required 3% reduction per year in order to restore energy imbalance by 2100AD. If we start next year, it will require 6% p.a. If we wait 10 years it will require 15% p.a.
  8. Recent droughts in Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico were 3 Standard Deviations outside the norm. Events such as these cannot therefore be ascribed to natural variability; anthropogenic climate disruption (ACD) is happening just as Hansen said it would 24 years ago (if we did not change course – which we haven’t).
  9. Pursuing emissions limits (i.e. Cap and Trade) will not work because there is no actual incentive to reduce emissions without any self-imposed restraint being to the advantage of others who do not do the same (i.e. the Tragedy of the Commons problem).
  10. Hansen uses the analogy of an approaching asteroid – the longer we wait to prevent it hitting us the harder it becomes to do so.

Do watch that Hansen video,

Second is that yesterday Martin Lack published an item that really does seem to endorse the view that there is no sign of intelligent life living on Planet Earth (not counting dogs!).

Think about it.  The planet is warming up.  The use of carbon-based fuels is a strong suspect, putting it mildly, of the rising levels of CO2 in our atmosphere, 394.45 on April 5th, so rather than change the incentives for using such fuels, we are taking advantage of  this warming planet causing the melt of the Arctic ice cap by allowing Shell to drill for oil in the Arctic.  But even crazier than that, Shell have contracted for a Finnish icebreaker to assist them in breaking up the ice!  (I really do feel a headache coming on!)

Greenpeace in the UK are running a campaign to stop this.

Sign up to save the Arctic

Let Shell know your feelings.

The pristine and beautiful Arctic: Shell wants to exploit it for oil. We want it protected.

Dozens of Greenpeace Nordic activists have boarded and occupied a Shell-contracted icebreaker in Helsinki harbour as it prepares to leave for the Alaskan Arctic.

Drilling in this fragile ecosystem – home to the polar bear, narwhal, Arctic fox and other iconic species – is unacceptable. A spill or accident in these waters would be disastrous and the harsh conditions would make responding to such a disaster almost impossible.

Demand Shell stop their plans to put the fragile Arctic and its biodiversity at risk.  We’ll keep you updated on our campaigns.

Write to Mr. Peter Voser.

Mr Peter Voser, Shell

The Arctic isn’t a place you can exploit, it’s a place we have to protect. Time and time again, experts have expressed serious doubts about the possibility of cleaning up an oil spill in the Arctic. The technical challenges posed by drilling there are obvious and no matter how much you try to convince people that your company can operate safely in such a harsh environment, we know the truth.

Because of this, I demand that you scrap your Arctic plans immediately.

Yours sincerely,

————–

By the end of this week we want 500,000 people shouting at Shell that it must end its campaign of Arctic destruction. Click here now[N.B. This is a time-sensitive campaign response – please visit Greenpeace website and enter your name and email address and they will email Shell on your behalf.]

We can change things! Together we can stop Shell and other oil companies from destroying the Arctic. Not everyone can board a ship to demand that change. But today, you can email Shell and ask them to stop drilling for oil and ask 10 of your friends to do the same. Together, we can save the Arctic!

Rosa Gierens
Greenpeace Nordic activist from Finland.

It’s not just an isolated instance of madness! Just a little over 10 days ago, I reported on President Obama’s support for the oil companies that threatens the polar bears, see “President Obama’s proposal for these magnificent and imperiled animals is a gift to Big Oil

In closing, luckily there are many voices being raised about putting an end to this madness; see the recent item from Patrice Ayme.  Hopefully, all these voices will bring about the changes to the way so many of us are governed.  As Patrice commented recently on Learning from Dogs, “Hope is the breathing of the planet“.  Maybe, just maybe, hope will win through.  No better put than by James Hansen,

Most impressive is the work of the Citizens Climate Lobby, a relatively new, fastgrowing, nonpartisan, nonprofit group with 46 chapters across the United States and Canada. If you want to join the fight to save the planet, to save creation for your grandchildren, there is no more effective step you could take than becoming an active member of this group.”
– Dr. James Hansen, head of Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NASA

Oh, and before I forget, a tornado touched down in Southern France!  Not common and not making sense!

8 thoughts on “Not so common sense!

  1. Thanks for the free advertisement, Paul. However, before anyone starts to thinking how clever I am, all I did was watch the video and write down 10 things Hansen said.

    I was not so conscientious when it came to Greenpeace – and thus completely missed the irony that Shell are going to use an icebreaker to ensure access is gained and/or maintained to the location they choose to drill. They are like an insect going forearmed into the web of a spider (and perhaps they know it).

    Like

  2. I include the following from Greenpeace that was emailed to me in the last few hours:

    ——–

    Hi there,

    Everyone has a limit. For me, it’s the Arctic – one of the last untouched natural areas on Earth. While Shell plans to exploit the Arctic for oil, I want it protected. So today I’m taking action off the coast of Sweden to stop a Shell-contracted icebreaker from heading to Alaska.

    Recently, you asked Shell to keep out of the Arctic – thank you. Now please add to the pressure and help persuade environmental investors to ditch Arctic drillers, starting with Shell.

    The icebreaker Nordica has just set sail for Alaska to help Shell drill for oil in melting Arctic waters. Two days ago, more than 40 Greenpeace friends occupied it for 10 hours in Helsinki Harbour. The Finnish media quoted the Captain of the Nordica as saying he’d been forced to delay the ship’s departure.

    But on Tuesday evening, the Nordica left Helsinki. So this morning, along with five other activists, I boarded and occupied the ship. I’m still onboard as you read this.

    I’m going to stop Shell for as long as I can, but I need your help to protect the Arctic.

    The Arctic is an incredible place – home to polar bears, narwhals, Arctic foxes, walruses and other amazing species. But climate change is putting enormous pressure on the Arctic’s wildlife. As the climate changes, the Arctic sea ice is melting.

    In the last 30 years, the Arctic has lost 75 per cent of its sea ice. And now Shell wants to drill for more of the fossil fuels that caused the melt in the first place.

    Drilling for oil in the Arctic is unacceptable. It is also extremely reckless – and recently banks like WestLB and insurers like Lloyd’s of London have started to point out the risks of investing in Arctic drilling.

    Shell may not care about the environment, but it does care about investors. If the top funds with environmental screens – as well as mainstream investors like WestLB – stop investing in Arctic drillers, it will send a signal to both the oil market and to financial institutions that the Arctic is not a good place to do business.

    Please sign the petition asking top fund providers that screen for environmental issues to drop all Arctic drillers, starting with Shell.

    For the Arctic,

    Andreas Bergstrom
    Onboard the Nordica

    ———————-

    Use this link if you want to follow this up http://act.greenpeace.org.uk/ea-action/action?ea.client.id=18&ea.campaign.id=14451

    Like

    1. Thanks Paul. I did not get this email. Petition signed, re-tweeted, and liked of Facebook.

      It is very encouraging to see people like Lloyds of London warning people off investing in unconventional hydrocarbons. Robert Goodin, who once said something like “it is more important that the right things be achieved than that they be achieved for the right reasons“>, would be pleased…

      Like

      1. Forgive me, Paul. I have a nasty habit of re-interpreting and sometimes over-interpreting things.

        The email from Greenpeace says Lloyds of London have warned (see link below) potential interested parties about the purely financial risks of investing in drilling in the Arctic. Although the risks are greatest in the Arctic because of the prevalence of bad weather. the risks are the same for any deep sea drilling location and (by my extension of argument only) any unconventional hydrocarbon exploration. In this category, I would include all exploration in remote and/or wilderness regions – on or off-shore – such as the Falkland Islands and Alaska.

        http://inhabitat.com/lloyd%E2%80%99s-of-london-report-forsees-disaster-in-arctic-development-and-drilling/

        Like

      2. Hey, if that’s your only bad habit, I tell you, don’t worry!! 😉

        OK, that’s a useful expansion and we can only hope that there is sufficient world-wide reaction from concerned people everywhere to cause Shell to reconsider. (But I’m not holding my breath on that one! )

        Like

  3. We are actually above 450 ppm of CO2 EQUIVALENTS.
    A few years back, to my amazement, I saw an enormous tornado (“water spout”) over the sea, not far from Saint Tropez, France.
    The French always insist to call their tornadoes “mini tornades”, an interesting case of denial…
    PA

    Like

Leave a reply to Paul Handover Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.