The unacceptable face of the big agricultural businesses
Another wonderful link from Naked Capitalism. This one refers to the way that the definition of ‘organic’ as in organic milk is being twisted and distorted to favour the huge indoor milking herds, up to 10,000 cattle, that in any sensible mind could never be regarded as the organic production of milk.
This to me is a picture of organic production of milk:
This to me is NOT! Yet the milk from these cows is defined as organic!
This last picture is courtesy of The Cornucopia Institute, another web site worth a visit whether or not you take an interest in farming – after all, one presumes that you do eat!
The article is on the Politics of the Plate website, worth your visit whether or not you are an American, and is, to me, so important that I am taking the liberty of publishing the article in full.
Here it is:
On some bureaucrat’s desk in President Obama’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB), sits a document that has the power to either destroy the nation’s 1,800 family-operated organic dairy farms or come to their rescue.
In the early 2000s, virtually all of the nation’s organic dairy farmers—not to mention the millions of consumers willing to pay a premium for organic products—agreed that milk certified as organic by the United States Department of Agriculture had to come from cows that had access to pasture.
As government regulations go, it sounds pretty straightforward: room to roam, clean air to breathe, fresh grass to eat. And that was the general consensus on what the National Organic Standards required.
But beginning in the mid-2000s, at about the time when it became evident that the green “USDA Organic” label translated into bigger profits, huge Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) with herds of up to 10,000 cows located in western states got into the organic milk business.
There was one obvious problem. How do you provide pasture for thousands of hungry cows in a semi-arid landscape that would, at best, produce enough feed for a few dozen animals?
The answer, according to Mark Kastel, co-founder of the Cornucopia Institute, an advocacy group for organic family farms based in Wisconsin, is that the corporations that owned the CAFO’s did everything they could to muddy the definition of “access to pasture.”
In some cases, a narrow, grassless strip outside the vast barns in which the animals were kept was considered “pasture” because some hay had been spread there. National Organic Standard Board (NOSB) allowances for cows and their very young calves to be kept indoors for a short period after birth were twisted to include all milking cows being kept inside 24/7 for 310 days a year.
Just take a quick glance at these photographs from Cornucopia and draw your own conclusions about whether this method of farming looks organic.
Either through bureaucratic lassitude or willful neglect, the big producers were helped every step of the way by USDA officials. “Between 2000 and 2008, they basically sat back and did nothing,” said Kastel in an interview.
Well, maybe not exactly nothing. After being prodded by complaints from Cornucopia, the USDA finally declared that the Aurora Dairy Corp. of Boulder Colo., which milked as many as 19,000 cows, was in “willful” violation of 14 tenets of the federal organic standards—the milk it was selling as organic was not. Aurora was allowed to modify its methods and continue selling milk that passes for “organic.”
Naturally, the handful of huge CAFOs milking in excess of 2,000 cows each, with their economies of scale, drove down the price of organic milk and increased their share of the market to at least 30 percent. Combined with a drop in demand, it was a disaster for the 1,800 family-operated organic dairies in the country (who typically tend between 60 and 100 milking cows and actually have pastures), many of whom had gone to the expense of converting to organic when the bottom fell out of the market for conventional milk products. “Today we have small organic farmers going out of business all the time,” said Kastel, who tells a tragic story of one desperate dairyman who went into his barn, shot all of his cows, and then committed suicide.
After years of official haggling, the USDA has finally produced a new set of regulations for organic milk production. The exact terms remain undisclosed, but Miles McEvoy, the newly appointed Deputy Administrator of the USDA’s National Organic Program, has assured Kastel that the new rules will be in line with an understanding organic producers arrived at by consensus in the early 2000s: Milk cows will graze on pasture for the entire growing season, or for at least 120 days in areas of inclement weather, getting 30% of their food from pasture.
That ruling now awaits OMB approval. And guess who has been lobbying hard to “sway the Obama administration,” according to the Organic Consumers Association? None other than Aurora Dairy (whose chairman Mark Retzloff and his wife, Theresa, contributed $4,600 to the 2008 presidential campaign of Thomas Vilsack, the current head of the USDA, according to Campaignmoney.com) “That level of donor historically buys access,” said Kastel.
He added, “Our biggest fear is that they will water this thing down. We’ve spent 10 years battling about this point. Now it’s all up to the stroke of a pen by someone in the Obama administration who is probably not an expert on this.”
Both the Cornucopia Institute and the Organic Consumers Association have initiated write-in campaigns to persuade the administration to make sure organic dairy cows in this country continue to do what cows do best: convert fresh grass into wholesome milk.
Should you feel inclined to let the folks in the White House know your feelings on the matter, here are the links:
By Paul Handover