A plea for science education.
Apart from hearing and knowing that many people are suffering terrible hardships in this world, I find few things more depressing than to hear young people say “I’m not interested in science”.
We are part of Nature. Science is the study of Nature.
How can it possibly NOT be the most interesting and endlessly-fascinating of subjects? There is a shortage of well-trained science teachers in Britain. There are too many students doing courses on “Football Management”, “Media Studies” or even “sociology”.
Why is this? I can’t explain it. Can anyone else?
I am not a scientist, having had to abandon the study of physics and biology – two subjects I loved – because I was better at languages. Too many youngsters have to drop science at the age of 16. What an absolute folly in the technological age, even 50 years ago.
My point is not just that science is important but that it is so interesting. Is the problem that some kids find it “too hard”? That must be poor teaching, surely? You gear your lessons to your students.
One positive point about British schools – at least in my distant experience – was the great use made of practical work. I so looked forward to that in physics: boiling up water in calorimeters, mucking about with levers and pulleys, passing electrical currents through each other …. I looked on physics lessons as a game, not a boring school subject.
Yes, science CAN be hard, especially for those not that good at maths. Some of the most brilliant minds on the planet do science; we cannot hope to understand all they do. But this doesn’t matter, does it?
As for maths, I have recently been reading a most stupendous book, one that I cannot recommend too highly to any layman interested in science. Shown right, this was written by Brian Silver, former Professor of Physical Chemistry at the Technicon Institute of Technology in Israel.
I read and re-read this book every night, each time hoping – somewhat in vain – that I will eventually understand what quantum mechanics and relativity really are. But I read it, too, with a tinge of sadness, for Brian Silver died in 1997, just prior to the publication of his book, which I personally feel is a masterpiece of its kind.
In this book Professor Silver takes us through the history of science from Antiquity and before right up to the end of the 20th century. As well as chapters on all the major fields and discoveries of science from Pythagoras to Hawking we have fascinating snippets of biographical information about the science greats: Galileo, Copernicus, Newton, Herschel, Boyle, Hooke, Faraday, Lavoisier, Maxwell, Mendel, Darwin, Planck, Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Einstein, Rutherford, Crick and so many more.
Their biographies themselves make fascinating reading, let alone their discoveries.
I read a book some years ago about Joseph Salk and the development of the polio vaccine. This was a hundred times more exciting than the most classy whodunnit, recounting the story of one of the greatest triumphs of medicine. Do you know anyone with polio? Nor do I, though I did when I was a kid in the 50s and of course there are many in “developing” nations still today, as we spend billions on CERN and not enough on medicine for the deprived of this world. Interwoven with the factual accounts of science and scientists considerable attention is given to philosophy and the placing of scientists and their discoveries in their historical context. A dry, purely factual book this isn’t, with the final chapters on cosmology, the origin of the universe and the meaning of life. (But don’t expect any answers to the last two!!)
Maths? Well, Professor Silver puts Michael Faraday right up there among the immortals. An astounding practical scientist/technologist, he made major discoveries in the field of electricity that affect the lives of everyone on the planet today. But his maths wasn’t too good! So much so that he pleaded with James Clerk Maxwell to write his equations in a more understandable way!
So you don’t have to be a great mathematician to do good things in science. If only I’d realized that before, I could have been another Faraday!
This book should be a standard textbook for all 6th formers, not just those doing science. I salute the brilliant and too-soon departed author.
By Chris Snuggs
Learning from Dogs 
Chris:
Relax, no one “understands” Quantum Mechanics or Relativity, especially since they more or less contradict each other. What is sure, though, is some empirical pieces of both, and some logical pieces of both. But staying below either with a final explanation, there is not.
Einstein’s Relativity generalizes to electromagnetism Galileo’s Relativity (except it’s Lorentz and Poincare’ who wrote the equations). Quantum Mechanics says that the infinitely small, well, is not just infinitely small. It can be infinitely big, and fundamental processes are sometimes nowhere in particular, but all over that Hilbert space known as the lab, which can be an entire… galaxy.
Science is not promoted enough by the democratic state, maybe because it’s so full of babbling lawyers without a technical background, and too many plutocrats who fear reason just as they fear light (which is normal with vampires).
PA
LikeLike