No bloated hyperbole about past achievements! No slagging off of the opposition! No daft prognostications. No ludicrous excuses. No pretentious blather. No lies! No wild scare-mongering!! No spin-ridden soundbites! Yup, deciding whether Britain staggers back to its feet again or sinks ever-deeper into irrelevant, bureaucratic and debt-ridden mediocrity is pretty important, but you also have to see the funny side of things.
Just recently Peter Hain said:
I think it’s important for people to act intelligently in this election.
This is brilliant advice, suggesting of course that once the election is over we can all happily go back to being stupid.
It is so useful to get really good advice from our prospective leaders. Thanks Peter.
I will try to act intelligently, but it’s never been a real strong point. Got any hints?
Would voting Labour be intelligent, perhaps? Or indeed the opposite? I am a bit confused ….. which is sad, as the future of my country is at stake.
Without intelligence we are done for. Such a shame it has been so lacking in government for the last 13 years of course.
Such a shame that British electioneering couldn’t be honest.
Well, the British General Election Campaign meanders along towards the final week before we are put out of our misery on May 6th.
Sadly, the main topic of interest has been the success of Nick Clegg in the Leaders’ TV debates. The new young face on
the block has proved once and for all the huge power of television. Not one single Lib-Dem policy or personnel changed during the debate, yet the mere appearance on the telly of a new, personable kid on the block has rocketed his party up the ratings.
Well, not exactly rocket science, but sobering all the same. However, more importantly, most policy discussion seems mired in a series of scare-mongering ploys along the lines of, “Don’t vote for that lot or this terrible thing will happen.”
Yes, perhaps this is the stuff of all elections, but this one should have been a bit different since
A) it comes after a long period of power held by the Labour Party and whichever way it goes will mark a historic change and,
B) the stakes are so high as Britain hovers on the edge of joining the economically-challenged PIIGS [Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, Spain, Ed.] of Europe.
We desperately need a government that can take us safely away from that particular event horizon, but to choose one rationally, we need the “truth” about what really needs to be done to reduce debt.
But sadly, we seem infected by the Greek syndrome, an ability to see the bleedin’ obvious, which is that nobody can live beyond their means for ever, much as they might like to.
So, we’re having to look for “the truth” further afield, to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), for example. According to them, the cuts in public costs will have to be as deep as any made since World War II. (Oh, and thank you to Labour and the banks for jointly getting us into this sorry mess.)
They may disagree in public, but privately they couldn’t agree more. On the single most important issue facing the country after this election, our politicians think it’s better to keep us in the dark.
WHERE is the party explaining this clearly and unambiguously to the people? In other words, TELLING THE TRUTH?
I don’t see it. Neither of the big, old dinosaur parties are being straight with us. The Tories are proposing to spend even MORE on the NHS, (National Health Service) that sacred cow that nobody dare speak any ill of, while Labour seem to be promising to spend more on just about everything despite our £163 billion borrowing this year.
Why is this? It can – I submit – only be because they don’t think the public will understand and accept “the truth”.
If party A tells the truth and admits the cuts in public services will be deep and involve some pain and party B LIES and says it will “preserve frontline services” (the Labour line) then they (Party A) fears the public will not buy their version and opt for whoever promises them a fantasy instead, or in other words a gradual recovery without too much pain and in particular for themselves.
So, there is deep cynicism and an extreme economy with the truth from all parties who fear a voter backlash if they tell it. This is rather a sad reflection on the Labour Party’s proud boast of “education, education, education” of 1997.
Apparently, the British public is so stupid that they can’t be trusted to believe the truth when they get it. Of course, this could possibly be because they are so UNUSED to getting it and moreover because this policy of spinning smoke and mirrors worked so well in previous Labour victories.
The British General Election is really hotting up, with mud flying in all directions.
Mr Pott. Your proposal to keep NI (National Insurance contributions for employers and employed) as it is rather than putting it up as we propose (as usual) will leave a black hole in the country’s finances.
Mr Kettle: a Black hole? YOU are worried about a black hole??? Ha, Ha, Ha ……
Your quiz question: Who are the real Mr Pott and Mr Kettle?